To never miss a blog follow via email:

Wednesday, November 30, 2016

If US TV networks would have reported this, it could have helped 1000s of businesses already

Credit: igor.stevanovic/Shutterstock

So, for months you have heard how the media (especially TV) fails the American public. The day before yesterday, apparently, they reported about Mr. Trump’s tweets while the beautiful city of Gatlinsburg, TN went up in flames. 

I am not going to comment on that; instead, I’ll tell you a story – a riveting story that shows you how US TV stations kept ignoring information that could help thousands of US businesses.

1.    It is nothing new that today reviews influence potential buyers’ decisions to actually buy, or – not.
2.    8 out of 10 shoppers consult online reviews before they buy.
3.    90% of potential buyers won’t buy a product that has been reviewed with an average of less than 3 stars.
4.    In other words, businesses whose products receive lots of great reviews sell lots of goods.
5.    This explains why Amazon and other eCommerce sites have been plagued with fake review issues. (Unfortunately, some organizations, including some Chinese businesses, like to cheat.)


6.    Considering all of that, you’d think, that a person who can tell US businesses how to get hundreds, if not thousands, of reviews – the proper way – would be invited on every TV station in this country.
7.    You’d think, anchors would beg this person to  p l e a s e  reveal expert insight; after all, this would help our economy.
8.    Here is what actually happened:
9.   I am a review expert, Amazon top reviewer, and author, who has studied the topic inside and out and published two books about it.
10.   After I discovered the newest method – how cheaters want to get reviews after Amazon announced the latest changes to their reviewer guidelines, to curb questionable methods – I contacted reputable media outlets so they would help me publicize how ethical US businesses can get reviews easily.
11.   Knowing that Amazon could only try to play catch up with the latest “cheaters’ efforts” I had decided I was going to give away 1 of my 7 tips – for free – to help US businesses.
12.   Only one organization was interested to talk to me – Bloomberg! Mr. Spencer Soper interviewed me and posted a podcast.


13.    Considering Bloomberg’s reputation, I thought this feature would spike TV stations’ interest.
14.    Not so!
15.    It turned out that the very same organizations who spent thousands of hours debating Hillary Clinton’s handling of her email, apparently, don’t even read their own emails. While all of them speculate what president-elect Donald Trump will do in the future (“...we'll just have to wait and see...”) none of them wanted to put a guest on air who would have said, "Look, here is what you can do – right now!"


16.    If the media would have given me five minutes of air time seven weeks ago, hundreds of businesses could have implemented my simple strategy, already.

17.    Why are they not doing it?
18.    Who knows?  
19.    Maybe the media likes to focus on billionaires these days. 
20.    Well, I am not a billionaire, but I always work on DOABLE solutions.  
21.    Solutions even a small start-up can implement, right away.
22.    To see one of my simple solutions to get product reviews – easily – the proper way – please click here.
23.   This web page has been live for seven weeks to aid US media people. Chinese and Ukrainian organizations have already found it, even though I did not send them a dozen emails.
If you like what you see please share. Somebody will thank you. Today, every business needs reviews and all of us want to read honest, authentic reviews.


Gisela Hausmann is an Amazon top reviewer and eCommerce expert. She is also the author of  “NAKED TRUTHS About Getting BookReviews” and “NAKED TRUTHS About Getting Product Reviews on 7 Tips to Boost Sales.”

Follow her on Twitter:


© 2016 by Gisela Hausmann

Friday, November 4, 2016

How to Double up or Triple up on Your Book Promotion

by Gisela Hausmann, author of the “naked, no-fluff marketing books”

Creating a successful book promotion is not easy, but there are ways how authors can double up or even triple up on promotions. Success attracts success.

Here are the simple facts:

If you want to write a bestseller, you’ll need to sell thousands of books to get the momentum which will prompt all eCommerce bookstores to feature your book in a top position where “everybody” can see it. It is almost impossible to achieve that just by collaborating with social media friends.
Here are the well-tested ways of promotion. You can

  • buy ads/promotions  - - - [can be costly depending on the service]
  • network on social media platforms  - - - [free, but time consuming]
  • get on TV (local and national)  - - - [one hour of time to write a well-crafted pitch + one (1) autographed paperback copy for the anchor]
  • get on well-known podcasts, and - - - [one hour of time to write a well-crafted pitch + one (1) autographed paperback copy for the host]
  • get your book featured in national magazines. - - - [one hour of time to write a well-crafted pitch + one (1) autographed paperback copy for the editor]

The key to launching a super successful PR campaign is to see each individual element as a cogwheel, which pushes the others forward; thereby carrying the effect farther. If aligned correctly, even a little cogwheel can move a big one. 

1) Being seen on local TV won’t sell thousands of books, but it will earn you something  incredibly valuable (even if you mess up) – a screen print of you getting interviewed on TV.  You can post it on your website and on social media platforms. Being interviewed on TV is not really that difficult; after all, you know your topic inside and out. Local anchors will always help you to present yourself best; it is in their interest that they/their program looks great. If you do well, your local TV-station might make you their “to-go”-person for your field of expertise.

The more often you get featured on local TV, the better your chances are to get on national TV. Naturally, the  anchors of national TV programs prefer guests with on-air experience. Additionally, you can also add the words, “a frequent guest at XYZ-TV-station” to your resume, your marketing materials, and your author pages.

2) Trying to get interviewed on a well-known podcast follows the same principle as getting on TV – you have to pitch the podcast’s host.

3) And, even getting your book featured in a magazine follows the same principle. You have to pitch the editor of the magazine where you want your book to be featured.

Each one of these PR-methods will get you access to a different target group – the people, who like to watch their news on TV, the people who spend hours sifting through magazines, and the people who like to listen to new information in the car, during their morning commute.

If you launch an ad campaign at the same time, it too will support the other elements of your PR campaign, and multiply the effect. People who see your book featured at any outlet will check it out (and its ranking); the better the ranking is, the more people will buy.

Having coached many authors, I know that most authors do really well pitching either one of the different mass media outlets. Then, they stop and wait. It is the biggest mistake authors can make because: Success attracts success. 

The perfect way to promote your book is to combine all forms of PR, including ads/promotions.

When one of my books was featured in the SUCCESS magazine, I immediately contacted the host of a well-known podcast. Impressed, he booked me for the following week. I also sent the magazine to the TV-station where I had been a guest already twice; the anchor booked me for two segments, three weeks later. I also announced the podcast as well as my appearance on TV at my social media platforms thereby increasing the multiplication factor on that end. Lastly, I approached the Barnes and Noble bookstore, where I purchased my copy of the SUCCESS magazine that featured my book and they too booked me for a book signing during the week that they ’ll introduce “books relevant for success in 2016.”

When you combine appearances in any mass media outlet with ads/promotions, the effect each one of these promotions has doubles, triples, and even quadruples.

So, how do you pitch professionally?

Never talk about your book! Instead pitch a topic closely related to your book, something readers or viewers will be interested. This system also works for books in all fiction genres.

In about 100 days Valentine's Day is coming up.

If you write romance novels, you could pitch:

“7 gifts your spouse will appreciate more than chocolates and flowers...”
“How to create a beautiful and truly personal Valentine’s card yourself – in 10 minutes”
“Have a Valentine’s picnic! 5 truly romantic spots less than one hour of ... (your city/region) ...”

Or, whatever other great idea comes to mind. The local TV-anchors will appreciate you “doing the work for them” and in return introduce you and your book on TV. Since you are in charge preparing this pitch you can take as much time as you need to prepare something truly outstanding.

What if you write historic novels?

You could pitch:

“3 historic practices celebrating Valentine’s during the days of yore that you have never heard of...”

Wrote  cooking book?
“How to cook a delicious Valentine’s dinner in under one hour...”

Wrote a children’s book?
“How to celebrate Valentine’s with the kids; and still find time to be ’romantic’?”

Wrote a horror novel?
There is no Valentine's Day pitch - You should pitch around Halloween!

Pitching any media outlet is limited only by your imagination.  You yourself have seen many interesting  stories in magazines and on TV, including some which might have prompted you to think, “How’d they come up with that?” Well, maybe the editors, hosts or anchors didn’t, but a clever author did.

Gisela Hausmann is an mass media expert; her work has been featured on various TV-stations, in the SUCCESS magazine, on the reputable 'The Brutal Truth about Sales & Selling PodCast', dozens of radio talk shows, in dozens of newspapers, and more than one-hundred online publications.  

She is also the author of

Follow her on Twitter:


© 2016 by Gisela Hausmann

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Was Amazon Hersteller und Vertreiber unbedingt wissen müssen um konkurrenzfӓhig zu bleiben

Die Autorin dieses Blogs ist die Amazon Toprezensention und eCommerce Expertin Gisela Hausmann. Die geborene Österreicherin lebt seit zwanzig Jahren in den Vereinigsten Staaten und ihr Deutsch ist leider bereits etwas "rostig."

Für Amazon Anbieter könnte dies der wichtigste Business-Blog sein, den Sie heuer im ganzen Jahr lesen werden. Er zeigt auf, wie Review-Clubs und chinesische Hersteller Amazon's Marketing System ausnützen um ihre Waren zu Bestsellerrang zu puschen, was natürlich gleichzeitig "ehrliche" Amazon Anbieter benachteiligt.

Dieser Blog zeigt auch auf, was "ehrliche" Amazon Anbieter machen können um diesen Aktivitäten entegegenzuwirken.

Wie weitgehend bekannt änderte der Internethӓndler Amazon am 3. Oktober 2016 seine Community-Richtlinien und sendete damit Schockwellen durch die Kreise der Amazon-Händler.

Diese radikale Änderung ist der letzte Schritt in einer Serie von Aktivitӓten, mit denen Amazon unvoreingenommene und objektive Amazon-Rezensionen garantieren will. Nachdem Amazon den ersten „getürkten Rezensions“-Skandal damit überwunden hat, indem sie 1,114 Rezensenten klagten, die Produkte und Bücher im Austausch für finanzielle Entschädigung rezensierten, wurden "stimulierte" Produkt-Bewertungen populär.

"Stimulierte" Produkt-Bewertungen sind Rezensionen die Hersteller und Verkäufer erwerben indem sie kostenfreie Produkte im Austausch für Rezensionen  anbieten. Um in Einklang mit Amazon's alten Richtlinien zu bleiben muẞten die Rezensenten in ihren Rezensionen bekannt geben, daẞ sie das Produkt im Austausch für eine Rezension umsonst erhielten. Obwohl dieses System anfangs sehr gut funktionierte dauerte es nicht lange bis verschiedene Organisationen begannen dieses System für sich auszunützen. 

Sogenannte Review-Clubs errichteten Internet-Plattformen um Amazon-Anbieter mit Leuten, die gerne Waren umsonst erhalten wollten und willens waren eine Rezension zu schreiben, zusammenzubringen. Dabei strebten die involvierten Parteien mehr nach Quantität als nach Qualität der Rezensionen.

Darüber hinaus überschwemmten chinesische Anbieter Top-Rezensenten wie mich mit hunderten von Angeboten für kostenlose und reduzierte Produkte. Ich persönlich erhielt pro Woche zwischen drei und zehn Email-Offerte von China (von denen ich kein einziges akzeptierte).

Der ganz offensichtliche Grund für diese "Groẞzügigkeit" war und ist noch immer: Es ist eine bewiesene Tatsache, daẞ die Anzahl und Qualitӓt von Rezensionen dazu führt, daẞ der Hersteller mehr Waren verkauft.

Heutzutage konsultieren acht von zehn Kӓufern Rezensionen bevor sie kaufen; entsprechenderweise wird die Kaufattraktivitӓt eines Produktes von der Anzahl der gegebenen Rezensionen direkt beeinfluẞt.

Ausserdem gibt es eine klare Beziehung zwischen der Zahl der gegebenen Rezensionen und der Bereitwilligkeit neue Rezension zu schreiben. Wenn ein Produkt bereits hunderte von Rezensionen hat, sind neue Kӓufer eher geneigt auch selbst eine Rezension zu schreiben. Das funktioniert nach den zwei Mottos: "Wenn es allen gefӓllt, kaufe ich es auch," und, "Wenn soviele Leute eine Rezension schreiben, schreibe ich auch eine."

Vor dem 3. Oktober führte das zur folgenden Situation:

1.Wenn die "Rezensenten"  die zu rensensierenden Produkte auch bei Amazon bestellten, stieg der Verkaufsrang dieser Produkte automatisch an.

2. Viele Produkte, die zusӓtzlich zum verbesserten Verkaufsrang auch noch "stimulierte" Rezensionen erhielten endete auf Amazon's Bestseller-Listen.

3.Interessierte Kӓufer, die sich auf Amazon-Bestsellerlisten neue Produkte ansahen kauften vieler dieser Produkte, die dann entspechenderweise auf den Bestsellerlisten blieben.
Um den Erzeugern und Vertreibern von qualitativen Produkten zu helfen publizierte ich im Februar 2016 mein Buch "NAKED TRUTHS About Getting Product Reviews on 7 Insider tips to boost Sales" (Die Nackte Wahrheit Über Produkt Rezensionen Auf : Insider enthüllt 7 Tipps für Mehr Umsatz.")

Mein Ziel war Erzeugern und Vertreibern von qualitativen Produkten aufzuzeigen, wie sie Qualitätsrezensionen erhalten können.

Am 3. Oktober 2016 bannte Amazon "stimulierte" Produkt-Bewertungen - komplett. Zusӓtzlich kam Amazon auch noch mit einer weiteren wesentlichen Änderung der Amazon Community-Richtlinien heraus, nӓmlich, daẞ nur Kӓufer, die bei Amazon Waren um mindestens 50 Dollar gekauft haben, auch Waren rezensieren können. Diese Regulierung soll verhindern daẞ Leute mehrere Amazon Konten eröffnen um mehrere Rezension für das gleiche Produkt abgeben zu können. Nunmehr müssen Schwindler, die zum Bespiel zehn Schwindler-Konten eröffnen wollen mindestens 500 Dollar "investieren", woraufhin sich das ganze nicht mehr rechnet.

Wahrscheinlich würden die meisten von uns vermuten, daẞ Amazon's drastische Aktionsschritte das "Schwindler"-Rezensionensgeschäft beenden würden, aber - weit gefehlt!

Nur zwölf Tage nach der Ankündigung von Amazon's Änderungen, habe ich bereits ein Dutzend E-Mails erhalten, die anbieten,

• "... Wir haben unseren Service in den USA neu gestartet und wollen mit der Bereitstellung von ...x... KOSTENFREIEN Geschenken starten ..."

• "... Ich schreibe dieses E-Mail, um ein Update in Bezug auf die letzten Änderungen von Amazon's Review Policy zu geben. Ich bin sicher, Sie haben schon gehört, dass es nicht mehr erlaubt ist kostenlose / diskontierte Produkte IM AUSTAUSCH für eine Rezension zu verteilen. Allerdings, ... ... KÖNNEN WIR Ihnen unsere diskontierte / kostenlose Produkte einfach so  zusenden. Bewertungen (Rezensionen) werden nicht mehr verlangt."
Und auch die Chinesen sind schon wieder zurück

• "... Wir wünschen, dass Sie unser Produkt durch die Bestellung von uns, die auf der Regel der Änderung in Amazon basiert (Amazon erlaubt die Bereitstellung von kostenlosen oder ermäßigten Produkten im Austausch für Bewertungen nicht mehr).
Wir geben Ihnen eine Amazon-Geschenkkarte, bevor Sie unsere Waren von Amazon bestellen. Der einzige Antrag, den wir für Sie beten, ist, dass Sie nicht sagen können, dass "das Produkt frei ist oder Sie die Waren mit unserer Geschenkkarte bestellen..."
[ original: “... We wish you can review our product by ordering from us which is based on the rule of change in Amazon(Amazon no longer permits providing free or discounted products in exchange for reviews. )
We’ll give you the Amazon gift card before you order our goods from Amazon. The only request we pray for you is that you can’t say “the product is free or you order the goods with the gift from us...]

Sind Sie fassungslos?

Ich war schockiert.

Dieses zuletzt erwӓhnte "chinesische Konzept"  soll folgendermaẞen funktionieren:
Der chinesische Verkäufer sendet eine Geschenkkarte als digitales Geschenk. Der Empfänger kauft die Ware, was den Verkaufsrang der Ware "verbessert" und die Ware auf "Bestseller-Kurs" einreiht. Und, falls genügend Empfänger das "Geschenk" auch noch rezensieren tritt das gleiche Szenario wie das vorher Erwähnte ein: Die Ware (das Geschenk) kann Bestsellerrang erreichen und gleichzeitig genügend Bewertungen um dort zu bleiben.

Logischerweise kann Amazon dieses neue chinesische System nicht stoppen. Amazon kann nicht  den Verkauf seiner Geschenkkarten aufgeben um zu verhindern, daẞ vielleicht eine Geschenkkarte für solch eine Transaktion verwendet wird. In der Realitӓt kann Amazon "stimulierte" Produkt-Bewertungen erst löschen wenn Amazon's Algorithmus sie auf seiner Webseite postiert findet.

Aber ich kann ich etwas tun, um das Spielfeld gleichzustellen...

Und ich mache es auch - mit diesem Blog.

Im Interesse der deutschen und österreichischen Wirtschaft habe ich beschlossen, einen der sieben Tricks aus meinem Buch zu veröffentlichen, in der Hoffnung, daẞ genügend Hersteller und Vertreiber von deutschen und österreichischen Qualitӓtsprodukten diesen Blog lesen und sofort entsprechende Schritte ergreifen. Nicht nur wird das dazu führen, daẞ sie die Rezensionen die ihre Produkte verdienen auch erhalten, es kann auch dazu führen, dass Konsumenten so viele ehrliche und unvoreingenommene Bewertungen zu sehen bekommen, daẞ "stimulierte" Produkt-Bewertungen kein attraktives Deal mehr sind.

Daher ist hier mein Beitrag zur Verbesserung der deutschen und österreichischen Wirtschaft:

Bitte teilen Sie dieses Blog, sodaẞ alle deutschen und österreichischen Hersteller und Vertreiber den Verkauf ihrer Qualitätsprodukte steigern können.

Ich ermutige auch alle Konsumenten, ihre ehrlichen und unvoreingenommenen Meinungen zu teilen, nicht nur über Produkte, die sie auf Amazon gekauft haben, sondern auch über die Services von Kleinunternehmen, die sie besuchen, und alle anderen rezensierungswürdigen Kӓufe.

Ich darf erinnern, daẞ acht von zehn Kӓufern online-Rezensionen in Betracht ziehen bevor sie kaufen. Daher zӓhlt jede Rezension!

Wenn Sie rezensieren "stimmen" Sie für einen Wirtschaftstreibenden Ihrer Wahl!

Gisela Hausmann
Amazon Top Rezensentin und
mehrfach preisgekrönte Autorin


Gisela Hausmann ist eine Amazon-Top-Rezensentin und eCommerce-Expertin. Sie ist auch die Autorin des Buches "NAKED TRUTHS über das Erhalten von Produkt-Rezensionen auf 7 Tipps, um Verkäufe zu steigern." (Zur Zeit ist nur die englische volkommen aktualisierte Ausgabe erhӓltlich. )

Folgen Sie ihr auf Twitter: @Naked_Determina

© 2016 by Gisela Hausmann

Picture credits (all via Shutterstock): Reviews glassy orange button by faysal, blank containers by Anteromite, GMO free natural product icon by Arcady, Vector 'Made in USA’ icon by FMStox, Stamp: 100% Recycled by Jason Winter, Pictograms for the recycling symbols by NoPainNoGain

Thursday, October 13, 2016

1 educated guess about Amazon's mysterious algorithm

Dear author friends,

My friends and fans who read the updated and revised edition of my book “NAKED TRUTHS About Getting Book Reviews” know that in this book I speculated that Amazon created an algorithm that can figure out if authors have joined Facebook groups that assist with getting book reviews. My reasoning came from checking out the works of authors who complained that they lost book reviews.

In the meantime, my guesses are as good as confirmed. 

Probably, you have heard that on October 3, 2016, Amazon changed its Community Guidelines FOR REVIEWING PRODUCTS, but not for reviewing books (though Amazon authors will be affected by the new rule that only customers who spent $50.00 at Amazon can post reviews). 

A few days earlier, came out with a program that evaluates Amazon reviews by more than one criteria. I addressed the flaws I noticed when testing this product in my blog “In response to’s “The Truth About ‘Incentivized’ Reviews on Amazon.”” 

Why is all of this important for authors, even though the community guidelines for reviewing books have not been changed? 

Clearly, the existence of ReviewMeta’s product proves what I speculated when I updated my book last June. 

If ReviewMeta, who is NOT affiliated with Amazon, can generate their kind of reports, imagine what Amazon who actually owns the data can do. 

It is important to remember that the majority of authors and vendors try to follow the guidelines; still, there are always a few who try to cheat. These are the ones who cause the troubles. 

Over the years I have seen many great Amazon features disappear. For instance, there was the Like-the-Author button. It’d probably still be available had not some authors set up “liking”-street teams, who liked hundreds of author pages whose name they had never heard of. 

The concept that they helped themselves is idiotic because Amazon is in the position to simply delete flawed data. Which means, the street teams worked, but it was wasted effort. Amazon simply deleted the feature.  

Equally, over the years, Chinese vendors must have formed some kind of clubs who exchanged (or maybe even sold) Amazon top reviewer email addresses. Even after I deleted my own email address from Amazon, I got inundated with emails from Chinese vendors, who kept offering me stuff I never review and quite obviously am not interested in. I myself marked the worst offenders' emails as Spam. 

Why am I telling you this? 

I want you to be aware that though ReviewMeta’s product is flawed, it'll give you an impression of the data Amazon’s algorithm can generate. I also want to remind you to look for readers/reviewers outside of online clubs. In the past I have posted three blogs about this topic. It is important to take these steps because you never know how many cheaters try to cheat the system thereby causing havoc elsewhere, where you don’t notice it.  

Gisela Hausmann is an Amazon top reviewer and eCommerce expert. She is also the author of  “NAKED TRUTHS About Getting BookReviews” and “NAKED TRUTHS About Getting Product Reviews on 7 Tips to Boost Sales.”

Follow her on Twitter:


© 2016 by Gisela Hausmann

In response to’s “The Truth About ‘Incentivized’ Reviews on Amazon”

For the record: I am an Amazon top reviewer who actually reviews products and therefore have deeper insights to the actual process.

As such, I disagree with the concept that ReviewMeta "exposed” the data not obvious to everybody who routinely consults reviews at Amazon for additional insights. 

I disagree even more with ReviewMeta’s notion that their program gives a “clear” impression about the reviews of specific products.

Equally, I disagree with ReviewMeta’s comment that they see “some” (?) products with 0% incentivized products. They see only some products?

Amazon sells 200 million products and the majority of these don’t feature any incentivized reviews. 

As an Amazon Top Reviewer and award-winning author of books about this topic, I believe that the data ReviewMeta generates is overall flawed. Here are the errors any real reviewer will spot in an instant: 

1) Phrase Repetition

The “phrase repetition”-feature does not really add value.
For instance, I reviewed Viva Labs The Finest Organic Extra Virgin Coconut Oil, 16 Ounce.
The program notes the following phrase repetitions: “Viva Labs Coconut oil”, “Use coconut oil” and “organic coconut oil.” Quite obviously, these phrases are not repetitions but they describe the product.  

2) Brand Repeats

Neither does the program’s “brand repeats”-feature add value. In this world with hyped marketing, it is only normal that customers favor a brand once they have come to like its products. 

3) Single-Day Reviewers

The “Single-Day Reviewers” feature detects if reviewers write dozens of reviews per day, which can be an indicator that they don’t research the product too well, simply because there isn’t enough time in the day. 

While this may be true, it has even been featured in the news that many Amazon reviewers consider reviewing their hobby. After all, a hobby is defined as an activity or interest people pursue for pleasure or relaxation their free time.

Additionally, top reviewers like I myself may review many items on a single day for organizational reasons. I read in bed almost every night. I bookmark pages and take notes, which is really easy on the Kindle. When I finish reading a book, I do not get out of bed to write my review. 

In fact, I may finish reading three books during one week and finally, on a weekend, take the time to review all three books and, additionally, some products, too.

In the real world, time management is considered to be a valuable skill. 

4) Overrepresented Word Count

I realize that in this day and age, many people communicate with 140 characters at a time. However, thoughtful reviewers who tested a product thoroughly and want to share their insights because that is what they do for a hobby, will most likely need between 150-200 words to state the facts. Therefore, this feature discriminates against thoughtful reviewers.
5) Deleted Reviews

Supposedly, the program tells how many reviews got deleted, either by the reviewer or by Amazon. However, it appears that consumers would have to watch and rerun the test over an extended time period, to actually gain this information. 

When I checked a product of which I was certain that at least one review had been deleted, because I myself deleted my own review, the program did not detect this fact, probably, because I deleted this review weeks ago. 

More issues:

Though I review more books than products, I purposely did not include book reviews in this blog because it seems, ReviewMeta’s program is designed for products. Any authors who use this program to see how their books rank will immediately notice that this product discriminates against the work of thoughtful reviewers. Obviously, an astute reviewer will write a longer review, thus the Word Count-feature becomes completely useless. 

Here are a few examples of ReviewMeta’s analysis of products I myself reviewed. Please note that I have no financial or other interests in any of these products. 


Telula – Organic Fruit Juice Beverage Blackberry + Chia - 32 oz. from Telula 
My review of this item:
ReviewMeta's analysis:

As it is, I am the only person who reviewed this product. ReviewMeta’s analysis announces that “unnatural reviews” are likely and the that product has insufficient “trustworthy reviews.”

Here is my simple rebuttal: Most people “discover” new food items in their supermarkets. Only, once they have come to like the one or other product, they might buy the same items from Amazon. Therefore, a reviewer’s first purchase is more likely to be a not verified purchase. 


Things got even worse when I checked out: 

Arriba Horchata Original Energy Drink, 11 Ounce (Pack of 12)

ReviewMeta’s program lists that 95% of reviews of this product are unverified purchases. Obviously,  the program can’t know that this drink is being sold in at least half the gas stations I visit. There, it is always presented next to Starbucks’ and Java Monster’s energy drinks. Therefore, it shouldn’t be a  surprise that probably hundreds of people pick up the drink by chance and decide that, because they like it, they will also review it. 


I also reviewed the
Catty Stacks Modular Boxes Cat House Condo, Snow White, 2-Pack, which I purchased at a big box pet store where the product was on sale, minus 50%.
ReviewMeta’s program noted an about 70% Overlapping Review history. It probably does not take Sherlock Holmes to figure this one out. Real cat owners also buy other cat products; and, obviously, there are less cat items than clothing, electronics, and/or food products. Therefore, the 70% Overlapping Review history does not shine light on any problem. 

The analysis also notes a Fail because of Skewed Helpfulness. Come on! We are talking cat lovers here...

Lastly, ReviewMeta’s program completely ignores the presence of photos and videos. In this case, my review is counted among the 24% of unverified purchases but there is no mentioning of the cute video of my cats playing on this item. 

Summing it up, though ReviewMeta’s program may be somewhat useful, it is flawed. It does not add any insider value.

To receive one free idea how to attract reviews easily, without having to subscribe to any kind of service please subscribe at
(Please note: emails are being sent out only every two weeks)

Gisela Hausmann is an Amazon top reviewer and eCommerce expert. She is also the author of “NAKED TRUTHS About Getting Product Reviews on 7 Tips to Boost Sales.”  (Fully updated October 11, 2016)

The German edition of her book “NAKED TRUTHS About Getting Product Reviews on 7 Tips how to Boost Sales” was featured in all of Austria’s major business publications.

Follow her on Twitter:


© 2016 by Gisela Hausmann