To never miss a blog follow via email:

Wednesday, August 23, 2017

3 Ways How to Respond to Blogs on LinkedIn So You Look Like an Ace


3Dman_eu


Most social media gurus recommend that professionals comment on influencers' LinkedIn blogs so they

a) might get noticed by the influencer-blogger

b) can help their own professional contacts by sharing valuable content

c) can polish their image/brand by adding valuable input, for all to see.

*

Still, maybe after reading an important blog you don't have to offer any insights because you are still digesting the blog's content.

Or, maybe you only want to comment so this blog will show up in your contact's LinkedIn news feed.

***

1) Posting unspecific acknowledgements like
  • "Great blog. THX for sharing."
  • "THX for sharing this valuable content."
  • "Thanks for the insight!"
 won't help. None of these comments indicate that you even read the blog.

BETTER STRATEGY 1:

Don't comment on the blog at all.
Instead share the blog with your followers and announce, "Friends, please read this truly interest blog by @..." and copy the influencer-blogger. Though you don't add any valuable input, at least you make yourself look like a player.

***

2) Equally "revealing" is the comment:

* "THX, I will read this later..."

Nobody cares what you will do in the future. Basically, this response says, "I noted that you wrote this blog but I am not making time to read it."


BETTER STRATEGY 2:

Copy the URL so you will find the blog again. When you have time to study it respond with an insightful comment. The time frame does not matter. In fact, if you post your response two to three days later you help the influencer-blogger to get their blog seen on LinkedIn's news feeds again. Most influencer-bloggers will appreciate that.

***

BEST STRATEGY 3:

If you want to get noticed:

  1. Make time, 
  2. study the blog in-depth, 
  3. come up with a meaningful response, 
  4. refer to the content so you demonstrate that you read the blog,
  5. edit your response at least twice, and 
  6. post your response, also cc'ing the influencer. 


Here is proof that this strategy works. Two influencer heavyweights, Pete Cashmore and Peter Guber, shared my response with their network.





Pete Cashmore is the CEO and founder of the popular blog Mashable, a Technorati Top 10 blog worldwide.

Peter Guber is an executive, entrepreneur, educator, and author. His films have earned over $3 billion worldwide and 50 Academy Award nominations.
Peter Guber’s most recent business book, Tell to Win – Connect, Persuade, and Triumph with the Hidden Power of Story, became a #1 New York Times bestseller.

~ ~ * ~ ~


Award-winning email evangelist Gisela Hausmann is the author of "NAKED WORDS 2.0 The Effective 157-Word Email" and 'NAKED TEXT Email Writing Skills for Teenagers." She is also the 2016 Winner of the Sparky Award "Best Subject Line."

Her work has been featured in SUCCESS and Entrepreneur, on Bloomberg (podcast) and on NBC News (biz blog).



To subscribe to Gisela's Blog pls subscribe to the RSS feed at the top of this blog's web-edition or sign up to receive summaries http://www.giselahausmann.com/free-creative-ideas.html

Gisela's website: http://www.giselahausmann.com/

Gisela tweets @Naked_Determina

RYX6ZF8QT9YW

© 2017 by Gisela Hausmann

Sunday, August 20, 2017

5 Ways to Spot - The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Author Blogs.



We live in a hyped world. Anybody who screams "This or that is bad" has a better chance of getting heard than the ones who offer solutions.

We see the same effect in politics. Even though I am appalled by many or even most things President Trump says, he was completely right when he blamed Mitch McConnell for failing to come up with a decent health care bill.

Mitch McConnell became Senate Minority Leader in 2007 and Majority Leader in 2015. Under his "leadership" the Republicans screamed "Repeal and Replace Obama care" for 7 long years, maybe to pretend that they were working.

If they would have been working, they would have conferenced with insurance experts, ran numbers, and discussed them in town-hall meetings just like they finally did, during the last seven months.

According to Mitch McConnell there wasn't enough time. Dare I say, "Senator, if you would have used every minute you spent saying, "Obama care needs to be repealed and replaced" with working on the issue you might have made it."

Only screaming "This or that is bad" isn't leading to a solution; all it is, is "hyping the issues."

We see the same from indie author bloggers who make their case, that "everything is Amazon's fault" just like many Republicans suggest that "everything is Obama's fault."

But, are the bloggers working on solutions? 

Full disclosure: I am also the author of half a dozen indie author "how-to"-books, however, I only write about topics I am a known expert in.


There are good, bad, and even ugly blogs. 




By my concept:

Good Blogs are written by industry experts who share some tidbits of their expertise, also to introduce their work (Somehow we have to find out whose goods and services we want to buy).

Bad Blogs are rehashed content presented in 50 shades of pink (hopeful and optimistic) or 50 shades of grey (as a stern warning). 

It's the year 2017. As I write this blog, at 10:30 a.m. EST, more than two millions blogs have been published — today! Yesterday, it was the same and also the day before and the day before that. Therefore: Don't believe everything you read.. 

Ugly Blogs cause real damage. Though they may present novel content often they violate industry guidelines or suggest cheater methods that will be discovered. 

*

(FUN exercise: Please click that link and write down the number of blogs you see.)


*

Already last year, I pointed out that there is no way that the 89 million blogs about "how to get book reviews" make sense.

Meantime, the 89 millions blogs about "how to get book reviews" have increased to 375,000,000 blogs about this topic; in short, people reblog or rehash and rephrase the same content on their blogs. Most often, this type of activity only increases the amount of useless information.

*

That is why I offer only blogs with real solutions. If I have nothing to contribute I don't blog.

And, while thousands of people read my blogs, unlike the hyped blogs they are not been shared thousands of times.





WHY?

Maybe, because some of the thousands of readers thought, "Ghee, this might work. I better keep this to myself." Though this concept thinking is understandable, please ponder the consequences.

Whenever a "good blog isn't winning" an inferior blog is winning

As an example:

1) Here is my Expert Blog
The 5 Most Common Mistakes When Seeking Book Reviews From Amazon Top Reviewers

Please note: Though this is still clever advice, in the meantime Amazon disconnected their top reviewers' email addresses  (I'll get to this in a bit.) - In contrast

2) An Inferior blog [I am not naming names] might state:
"... Just tailor this template and send it to top reviewers..."




A) As a result, top reviewers received thousands of emails tailored after the mentioned or slightly different (silly) templates.

B) Equally, bad bloggers came up with the great idea to blog, “Here is what I do... To my email I attach a .mobi file of my book...”

Eventually, many top reviewers had enough and blocked their profiles.

C) Lastly, the really UGLY bloggers came up with the idea to subscribe reviewers to Mailchimp lists, without their permission, which is a clear violation of the CAN-SPAM Act 2003.

Which was probably the reason why Amazon disconnected the top reviewers' email addresses. Amazon does not want to be accused of enabling SPAM, by their reviewers or the FTC.

*

Did you notice that every time one of these hyped blogs got shared and multiplied honest and good indie authors lost opportunities even if they did not participate in any of this?




In contrast to previously mentioned useless suggestions, buyers of my book "NAKED TRUTHS About Getting Book Reviews" got to read, "Save only the email addresses of the top reviewers who read your specific genre on a spread sheet..." & "Don't treat them as part of Amazon' inventory..."... Maybe send them best Christmas wishes... 

The authors who bought my book and followed this advice still have a way to reach the top reviewers. They just need to pull their spread sheets. 

In the 3rd version of this book I present how to contact top reviewers under the new, changed conditions. Top-10 and Hall-of-Fame reviewer Bassocantor called this method "... true, useful, and ethical..."

Which is another reason why expert authors and bloggers have to produce excellent, "... true, useful, and ethical..." content. Their colleagues would just tear them apart and their reputation would evaporate quickly.

*

The bad and ugly don't worry about that.

They'll find a different reason to scream "It's all Amazon's fault"..." and yeah, "everything else is Obama's fault."



The truth is
Amazon gave indie authors an awesome marketing opportunity 
They gave indie authors access to the email addresses of their top-10,000 out of 50 million reviewers (of which about 5,000 reviewed indie authors' books) 

Bad and ugly blogging led to this opportunity being taken away.

*

Now, please click this link again and compare numbers:

http://www.worldometers.info/blogs/

That's how many blogs were published while you read this blog. It's your guess how many of these blogs are good, bad, and ugly blogs.

*

How to find great blogs

1) Remember the First Amendment

When reading a blog always remember that in the United States the First Amendment guarantees people the right to write, even about things they know nothing about or can’t prove to be true.

2) Check the blogger’s background!

Every blogger features a short resume at the beginning or the end of their blog. Always study it and also — verify it. Don’t hesitate to ask poignant questions.

The same goes for books. Some of the bad and ugly write books instead of blogs.

3) Don't follow the lead but think for yourself

The other day I noticed a "new Amazon review expert." This author had published only two books in less than two years. Can anybody with less than two years experience be an expert? — I read this author's book about getting reviews. It had dozens of glowing reviews. Only after I published my thoughts suddenly other reviewers too articulated doubts about the presented method. (It's extremely questionable.)

4) Check the date!

If a blog is older than six months, chances are at least some parts may be outdated. Things change quickly these days and not everybody is an ethical writer who un-publishes obsolete content.

5) Don't share bad or even ugly blogs!

In the long run you may pay the price even though you yourself may not have followed the suggested concept.

On Twitter, many authors share blogs they don't read. In reality, they share the title of the blog.

At a time when 4 to 6 million blogs get published d a i l y doing that can be quite dangerous.
Years ago, I read a super blogger's advice, "Don't spend more than two hours on writing your blog but think about the title for a whole day." While that may be smart advice, it may also have helped to kill marketing opportunities for indie authors.

*

I'd love to open up the conversation about this topic, so please share your thoughts in the comments.


*
~~~ *** ~~~
*

Gisela Hausmann is a 29-year publishing industry veteran who self-published her first book in 1988.

Her work as an Amazon ecommerce review expert has been featured on Bloomberg (tech podcast) and on NBC News (biz blog);  her work as an email evangelist was featured in SUCCESS and in Entrepreneur.


To subscribe to Gisela's Blog pls subscribe to the RSS feed at the top of this blog's web-edition or sign up to receive summaries http://www.giselahausmann.com/free-creative-ideas.html

Gisela's website: http://www.giselahausmann.com/

Gisela tweets @Naked_Determina

RYX6ZF8QT9YW

© 2017 by Gisela Hausmann
Title picture: Avatars by Toonstyle(dot)com via Shutterstock

Thursday, August 17, 2017

A top reviewer's feasibility study about reviewing indie authors' books




This is a long blog (1,404 words and some numbers) but it's important. So, I ask you to set aside some time, study this blog and all its data in-depth, and share it with your author friends who need to know this information.

Hello, my name is Gisela Hausmann. I am a dedicated indie author who is also a publishing industry veteran. I self-published my first book in 1988 when nobody dreamed of e-readers, e-books, and Print-on-Demand.

I am also an Amazon top reviewer, who observes Amazon since 1998 when I became one of their vendors.

To subscribe to my blog summaries please click here.

Here is a newspaper article showing President Clinton about to receive my first book.




*

Unfortunately, NOT ONLY DO many of today's book marketers NOT have this expertise, quite many are no book marketers but really Internet marketers.

*

The typical Internet marketing strategy is to create a surge of interest by offering “the product” for free or extremely reduced.

In an ideal world, customers who acquired the free or extremely reduced product spread the word, which leads to follow-up sales. The problem with this strategy is that books are not typical products like kitchen gadgets or seasonal products; it takes time to read books. "Book hoarders" may never read all books they download.

This leads to authors paying for promotions, getting excited about the number of free downloads, but then – reviews trickle in only slowly and follow-up sales may not even recover the costs of the marketing campaign.

Which is why I keep hearing from authors that tweet campaigns don't work

*

As a mass media expert I am also fascinated with reviews.

I have been reviewing books since 2012 and I reached top reviewer status in 2014. I also published and updated books about how to get book reviews, always in accordance with Amazon's latest guidelines.


Having studied Amazon's policies since 1998 when I became one of their early vendors, I can say with certainty that the fact that Amazon does not show "unverified reviews" by default any longer is one of indie authors' biggest problems.

The change happened in February 2017.

This blog shows my review data to demonstrate and explain the issue.

***

On the following lists, I am showing the combined numbers of "likes" my book reviews received as well as individual results of book reviews that received 5 or more "likes."

To make my point it is not necessary to list the number of "not helpful"-votes, hence I don't feature them to avoid data overload. Also, I did not list my product reviews data.


*******************************************

In 2013, I reviewed

58 indie authors books, which so far garnered 313 "likes"

[ 80 (combined) + 140 + 25 + 17 + 11 + 11 + 10 + 7 + 7 +5 ]

That's right. In 2013, I wrote a review of an indie author book that received 140 "likes," and others that received 25 "likes, 17 "likes," two reviews that were "liked" 11 times, and so on.

and 30 traditionally published books, which garnered 62 "likes"

[ 26 (combined) + 15 + 9 + 7 + 5 ]

The most liked reviews of traditionally published books garnered 15 "likes"and 9 "likes."

*******************************************

In 2014, I reviewed

50 indie authors books, which garnered 194 "likes"

[ 60 (combined) + 16 +14 + 12 + 10 + 8 + 7 + 7 ]

and 3  traditionally published books, which garnered "likes."


*******************************************

In 2015, I reviewed

72 indie authors books, which garnered 165 "likes"

[ 96 (combined) + 17 + 10 + 9 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 5 + 5 + 5 ]

and 24 traditionally published books, which garnered 93 "likes"

[ 38 (combined) + 23 + 11 + 10 + 6 + 5 ]


*******************************************

In 2016, I reviewed

55 indie authors books, which garnered 94 "likes"

[ 74 (combined) + 20 ]

One of these reviews was "liked" 20 times; all other reviews received 4 or fewer likes, or none at all

and 11 traditionally published books, which garnered 19 "likes."


*******************************************

So far, in 2017, I reviewed

32 indie author books which received 19 likes, with none of them receiving more than 4 likes

and 11 traditionally published books which received 34 "likes."


*******************************************

Please see this data again, summed up.





Clearly, the indie author book reviews I wrote in 2017 are not getting "liked" as often as reviews I wrote in 2013.

Though one might argue, that book reviews which have been online since 2013 could collect more "likes" please compare the indie author data with the trad-pub. books' data.

Indie author books' reviews' "likes" are going down,
trad-pub. books' reviews' "likes" are going up.

The drop of "likes" of indie author book reviews from 2016 to 2017 is significant ( 1.7 => 0.6)
and so is the increase of "likes" of trad-pub. authors' book reviews ( 1.7 => 3.1).

At all times, the number of "likes" trad-pub. authors' book reviews received was greater than the number of reviews. But, indie author book reviews aren't – in 2017.

Here are the average increases and decreases in a separate illustration.





Throughout these five years I accepted no more than 10 ARC copies, about 2 per year. I either buy books or I "rent" them with KU (which results in reviews being counted as non verified reviews).

Logically, I buy more traditional published books because they are less likely available through KU.

Which proves: People are not reading "unverified reviews." That's why they don't see my indie author book reviews and also can't "like" them.

*

So, how did this mess happen?

In March 2016, Amazon changed their community guidelines and required that reviewers who received a free review copy stated this fact in their book reviews.

Roughly at the same time, the "Trump-Twitter-Effect" began to take its toll on book marketing campaigns. Book marketing campaign services tried to compensate by founding book review clubs.

Since most authors did not want to buy books tit for tat, authors began reviewing each others' free books.

The rampant abuse was obvious. Anybody who scanned book reviews noticed books with 90% non verified reviews all of which stated, “I was provided with a free review copy.”

And so it came about that Amazon tightened its guidelines; non verified reviews are not visible by default any longer. Rather than wasting time and effort figuring out how to distinguish between "these and those" non verified reviews, Amazon simply hid them by default and let the customers decide if they want to see these reviews.

Of course, it does create a not so great impression. Just imagine what you think when you look at a book or at a kitchen gadget that has 3 verified and 10 non verified reviews.

For me, this was extremely painful. A dedicated indie author supporter, I spent years publishing best strategies and I updated my books religiously to present best practices (and tricks) in accordance with Amazon's ever-changing guidelines.





There are a few lesson to be learned from this situation:

1.

Amazon knows everything. Even if they did not remove (book club) friends' book reviews, they know what's going on. If I could put together above data  – by hand (!) – in less than two hours, imagine what Amazon can do in their many data centers around the globe. Also, I still meet authors who don't know that Amazon suppresses friends' reviews because the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) requires them to do so.

2.

If you engage in book club review activities always remember that "unverified reviews" may not be read or taken seriously.
Instead of "networking in Facebook groups" call your high school buddy and ask him/her to #buy and #review a copy. Start with the one who wrote the best essays. If he/she does you can call "the others."

3.

Consider taking at least some of your book marketing activities "off-line." Though arranging for book signings and meeting with "real life" book clubs is more work, the above featured data indicates that marketing books online exclusively is not as success-prone as it used to be.

As an additional benefit – your "off-line" activities cannot be tracked!


*

I want to open up the conversation about this topic, so please share your thoughts.


*
~~~ *** ~~~
*

Gisela Hausmann is a 29-year publishing industry veteran who self-published her first book in 1988. 

Her work as an Amazon ecommerce review expert has been featured on Bloomberg (podcast) and on NBC News (biz blog);  her work as an email evangelist was featured in SUCCESS and in Entrepreneur.




To subscribe to Gisela's Blog pls subscribe to the RSS feed at the top of this blog's web-edition or sign up to receive summaries http://www.giselahausmann.com/free-creative-ideas.html

Gisela's website: http://www.giselahausmann.com/

Gisela tweets @Naked_Determina

RYX6ZF8QT9YW

© 2017 by Gisela Hausmann

Thursday, August 3, 2017

My Quotes

Gisela’s quotes


"In this world of endless opportunities our dreams compete. If we wait to start a journey, the destination may not be anymore what we wanted to find."— Gisela Hausmann

Friday, July 21, 2017

What authors can learn from car salesmen


  1. "This car could really use a new owner."
  2. "I am in desperate need of a buyer for this car."
  3. "I know that you drive a Honda, so I thought you might like to buy my Honda."


Can you imagine a car sales man saying any of these things? 

Probably not.

Therefore, avoid phrases like
  1. "My book could really use a more reviews."
  2. "I am in desperate need of reviews for my book."
  3. "I know that you read ...xyz... (book title), so I thought you might like to read my book which is similar. 


 Car salesmen say things like,
  1.  "... 6-time 24 Hours of Le Mans winner Jacky Ickx described the Audi R8 as "the best handling road car today"
  2.  "... This Ford Mustang's design characteristics include a fastback profile and a lower-set grille..." 
  3.  "... This 1967 Thunderbird Apollo's features include writing tables (for rear seats) and rear seat reading lamps..."

Be as specific as car salesmen are.  

What are your book's best "features?"

Please comment in the comment section. 

Think like a car salesman before you post!

Feel free to mention your book title. 
Please do not post a link because if blog readers do that I have to delete the blog.- I write #NakedBooks; hence you can believe that I do what I say. 

~*~



Gisela Hausmann is a 29-year publishing industry veteran who self-published her first book in 1988. Her work as an Amazon ecommerce review expert has been featured on Bloomberg (podcast) and on NBC News (blog);  her work as an email evangelist was featured in SUCCESS and in Entrepreneur.


To subscribe to Gisela's Blog pls subscribe to the RSS feed at the top of this blog's web-edition or sign up to receive summaries http://www.giselahausmann.com/free-creative-ideas.html

Gisela's website: http://www.giselahausmann.com/

Gisela tweets @Naked_Determina

RYX6ZF8QT9YW

© 2016 by Gisela Hausmann
© Picture credit: Pexels.com

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

No! I It Does Not Look as if Amazon Spies on Indie Authors in Facebook Groups


(Excerpt from NAKED REVIEW How to get Book Reviews )

ONE OF THE MOST PERSISTENT RUMORS


Though it is one of the most persistent rumors that Amazon tracks authors’ social media feeds and spies on Facebook groups I do not believe this to be true.


The #1 reason is that filtering out relevant data on Facebook would be extremely complicated. Most authors are members of at least eight Facebook groups. 


The #2 reason is that occasionally I read articles about algorithms “infused with A.I. (artificial intelligence).” To sum it  up: Not only are these algorithms already great in identifying “common denominators,” they get better every day.   


Reason #3: In 2015, the cybersecurity company Avast made their case who spies on whom, and Amazon is not on this list but Google, WhatsApp, and Facebook were. 


Hence the following scenario is much more plausible than the rumor that Amazon spies on authors on Facebook.  

Many authors join Facebook groups to find reviewers. Though all Facebook author groups I know stick by Amazon’s guidelines and advise against direct review exchanges, typically authors who DO NOT seek reviews elsewhere run into problems at some point.  They lose reviews. 


The following simplified illustration depicts a potential scenario for “reviewing and seeking reviews” in a Facebook group. 


In stage 1 some authors read and review another author’s book. Clearly, the scenario is completely random.



(Still, if Amazon would really “spy” on Facebook they’d know that

authors A – Q are in the same Facebook group and apparently know each other

A read N’s book,

B read C’s book,

D read G’s book,

H read B’s book,

I read J’s book, and

L read Q’s book.

 

In stage 2, a pattern begins to emerge. 

In stage 3, the pattern is completely clear. Probably, Amazon’s algorithm can identify it.

 

The authors who do NOT also read books from other authors who are not represented in this group, have just self-identified themselves as authors who engage in some kind of review exchange. 


What if the group is larger and has 1,000+ members? 

It does not matter how large the group is, the deciding factor is how many members are actively reading and reviewing.

 

In the past, I noticed author friends reading as many as five books from other authors in the same group. Occasionally, I stumble over a book which features eight to ten reviews, all from authors who I know are in the same author groups. It is a reasonable conclusion that after churning enough data Amazon’ algorithm can see the previously illustrated pattern and deletes some reviews.   


Summing it up: Seeking reviews from “peripheral friends” can be a good idea to get “starter”-reviews, but if you want your book to become a bestseller, inevitably, you need to make an effort to get your book known to many more people than you could know personally or on any social media platform.

~*~

Excerpt from NAKED REVIEW: How to Get Book Reviews - To be released July 20th - Moon Landing Day).

Gisela Hausmann is a 29-year publishing industry veteran who self-published her first book in 1988. Her work as an Amazon ecommerce review expert has been featured on Bloomberg (podcast) and on NBC News (blog);  her work as an email evangelist was featured in SUCCESS and in Entrepreneur.



To subscribe to Gisela's Blog pls subscribe to the RSS feed at the top of this blog's web-edition or sign up to receive summaries http://www.giselahausmann.com/free-creative-ideas.html

Gisela's website: http://www.giselahausmann.com/

Gisela tweets @Naked_Determina

RYX6ZF8QT9YW

© 2017 by Gisela Hausmann


Saturday, July 15, 2017

3 Ways how Indie Authors Deal with the "Non Verified Reviews" Issue

THE ISSUE: Non verified reviews (book & products) are not shown by default any longer.

In February 2017, Amazon began hiding non verified reviews by default. Now, customers have to change the default setting from “see all verified purchases” to “see all reviews” to also see non verified reviews.


This change is retro active. By default, non verified reviews that were posted in the past are also "invisible."

Exploring the specifics of this new rule, I found that as long as verified and non verified reviews fit on the book’s first book page, all reviews (verified and non verified) will be shown. Only once reviews need more space than what is provided on the (first) book page, the non verified reviews disappear.

EXAMPLE: 

The book page of a book that received 3 reviews, 2 verified reviews and 1 non verified review of medium length (about six lines) shows all 3 reviews.

After this book received an additional 5 non verified reviews, only the 2 verified reviews will be visible by default because combined all 8 reviews take up more space than is available on first book page. To also see the six non verified reviews, customers have to change the settings.

ENSUING PROBLEMS:

a) Unfortunately, not every review reader checks out non verified reviews

b) Non verified reviews look a tiny bit suspicious simply because Amazon does not volunteer to show them.

c) Some review readers don't trust non verified reviews; after all, everybody from The New York Times to Forbes reported about Amazon's various fake review scandals.

SOLUTIONS:

1) Don't ask for too many reviews in "review clubs." They won't get you as far as they used to. If your book's sales rank does not correspond with the number of reviews they'll look "suspicious."

INSTEAD: Make contact with your old friends. Amazon does not know who your high school buddies were.

2) Don't wait with asking for book reviews! Thinking "Let's see how things go" could be a tragic mistake.

INSTEAD: Because Amazon reviewers expect author-supplied review copies, ask them early, when your book has only few reviews. That increases the chance that their non verified reviews get seen; hence, they are more likely to accept your book.


3) Carefully consider if you want to enroll your book in KDP. The reviews of Kindle Unlimited readers who read your book "free with Kindle Unlimited" will be non verified reviews too.

INSTEAD: consider promoting your book with 99 cents promotions. You can schedule the promotions yourself; all readers will be able to post verified reviews.


~~*~~

Gisela Hausmann is a 29-year publishing industry veteran who self-published her first book in 1988. Her work as an Amazon ecommerce review expert has been featured on Bloomberg (podcast) and on NBC News (blog);  her work as an email evangelist was featured in SUCCESS and in Entrepreneur.



To subscribe to Gisela's Blog pls subscribe to the RSS feed at the top of this blog's web-edition or sign up to receive summaries http://www.giselahausmann.com/free-creative-ideas.html

Gisela's website: http://www.giselahausmann.com/

Gisela tweets @Naked_Determina

RYX6ZF8QT9YW

© 2017 by Gisela Hausmann